Industry guides · PRACTICAL GUIDE

Which email trust gaps should an independent insurance agency review?

Map the agency's senders and customer-request channels while keeping authentication, account security, and compliance responsibilities distinct.

The short answer
Start with the agency's own sending identity, the tools that send under it, and the channels used for sensitive customer requests. Confirm who owns each route and what happens when a request changes. Email authentication is one part of that review. It does not certify an agency's compliance, determine insurance coverage, or validate a request to move money.

Why does the agency need a communication map?

Map your actual mix of employee mail, agency-management systems, marketing tools and carrier portals. Separate agency-domain messages from carriers or others using their own identities.

The NAIC notes that insurers and producers handle sensitive consumer information. An email review should therefore account for where requests send the customer next, not just the appearance of the message. Identify which portal, phone route, or other approved process belongs to each type of request. Source

What should staff know about an unexpected request?

Agree who can verify a changed contact, document destination, or payment instruction. Use an established customer or partner record to find the verification route. Do not let the new request redefine both the action and the way it will be checked. Give staff a clear place to escalate uncertainty.

Rehearse a fictional request: a familiar contact wants a change, the usual representative is unavailable and a deadline approaches. Identify who can pause and who provides backup approval. This is process practice, not evidence of an incident.

Which agency senders should be checked?

Start with employee mail, then ask operations and marketing about automated messages. For every tool that uses the agency's domain, record a business owner, the address customers see, and the person who manages configuration. Include infrequent messages such as renewal reminders when they are part of your actual workflow.

Request representative authentication evidence rather than assuming that a successful message from one account covers every tool. If a carrier sends from its own domain, record that boundary. A review of your agency's DNS cannot establish the carrier's account security or approve the content of its instructions.

  • Name the service and its owner within the agency.
  • Record the domain shown to the customer.
  • Describe what the message asks the customer to do.
  • Keep the test result and unresolved questions with the inventory.

What belongs outside an authentication review?

Mailbox access, staff permissions, document handling, retention, incident response, and regulatory duties need their own assessment. NIST's multi-factor authentication guidance addresses account access, a different control from public sending records. Keep these workstreams connected without allowing one completed task to stand in for all the others. Source

Do not use a passing DNS check as a compliance certificate or an assurance about a policy's response to a loss. Questions about applicable obligations and insurance coverage belong with the responsible professionals and the actual documents. No email configuration finding answers those questions by itself.

What should the owner ask for at handoff?

Ask for the reviewed domains and senders, approved changes, observed tests and exceptions. Assign each exception an owner. Close a named workflow gap rather than adding a security label to the website.

Published review date: September 9, 2026.By Al Cirton · Kova OS

Related guides

Separate the agency’s senders from its partners’ senders.

List the tools that send using your agency domain and identify who owns each one. Keep carrier-domain, sensitive-document, account-access and compliance questions with their responsible owners. Do not send policyholder records or private client messages through a Shield inquiry.

The free check reads public SPF, DMARC and MX records plus selected website signals. It does not verify every sender or replace a security audit. Review findings with your domain administrator before making changes.